Martin Luther 95 Theses Meme Painting Reformation Day shirt

Category

Trending Shirts

Design

Original artwork, copyright protected

Printing

Printed to order and shipped from the USA

Processing

2–3 business days after your order is placed.

Delivery

5–10 business days within the US, 7–15 business days internationally.

Cost

Calculated at checkout from your address and the number of items.

Tracking

A tracking number is emailed as soon as your order ships.

Read the full shipping policy

The question was “What are considered to be ‘the Martin Luther 95 Theses Meme Painting Reformation Day shirt but I will buy this shirt and I will love this waters of the United states?’” Not “What makes a water resource connected to another?” Your definition would mean that an artificial lake built for a housing development is considered “Waters of the United States”. Which is nonsense. “Navigable waters” is the term they use to define the waters of the US. Navigalble waters are defined as ” those waters that are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide and/or are presently used, or have been used in the past, or could be used in the future to transport interstate or foreign commerce.” So that artificial lake could count if large enough to ride in a boat that could facilitate selling stuff from one place to another. The ebb and flow of the tide is what’s difficult here to discern, as does groundwater count as ebb and flow? It should, but does the court think that? Seemingly not as they are only concerned with surface water.

Martin Luther 95 Theses Meme Painting Reformation Day shirt, hoodie, tank top, sweater and long sleeve t-shirt

The relevant part is interstate or foreign commerce. Very few artificial bodies of water will meet that requirement. An artificial lake would have to cross borders to qualify. The ebb and flow of tides part is meant for very large bodies of water. Not really relevant to an artificial lake where the Martin Luther 95 Theses Meme Painting Reformation Day shirt but I will buy this shirt and I will love this impact of tidal forces is almost nothing. That fake lake is going to have water coming from somewhere and then going somewhere else. In most cases that’s going to be a spillway leading to a preexisting waterway. Not always. Stormwater ponds, for example, only have outlets when they flood due to storms. Otherwise, there are no outflows and they are designed to retain the water year round. Considering those to be “Waters of the United States” would fail Chevron Step 2’s tests for reasonableness of the Agency interpretation: the Agency cannot predict when, or even if, the pond will experience an outflow. Its an emergency precaution, and signals nothing about the likelihood it will become connected to a waterway. It only signals the company who built the development follows best practices. That doesn’t mean it is considered a part of the US waterways. It keeps hitting me that it’s crazy for a bunch of judges to make decisions on scientific matters they are clueless about. It is their job to understand what they are arguing for or against. I mean Alito seems to be suggesting in his opener the definition of pollutant is too broad because it can refer to “mundane” things like rocks and dirt (defined in US code 1362(6)). At a minimum he could make a better argument if he knew what he was talking about. Rocks and sand isn’t mundane because of how they are often used. People buy lake property and absolutely annihilate natural shoreline. No weeds, no marshy areas for all the wildlife to actually live in. It becomes open lake beach or rocks and manicured lawns where all the crap they spray for the lawn runs into the lake.

1. Length is measured from the highest point on the collar down to the bottom hem. 2. Width is measured across the body of the shirt under the armpits, one way. 3. Sleeves are measured from center back to hem.