Garfield Lasagna Bizkit Shirt

SKU

OCE22HB3

Category

Trending Shirts

Design

Original artwork, copyright protected

Printing

Printed to order and shipped from the USA

Processing

2–3 business days after your order is placed.

Delivery

5–10 business days within the US, 7–15 business days internationally.

Cost

Calculated at checkout from your address and the number of items.

Tracking

A tracking number is emailed as soon as your order ships.

Read the full shipping policy

Plot twist: Josie was not drunk. She sexually assaulted Jake and falsely reported him in order to win a bet she made with her friend. I think they did some kind of study and figured out that the Garfield Lasagna Bizkit Shirt besides I will buy this good guys are now scared to have sex for fear of false allegations and the people that would have taken advantage of women anyways don’t really care about these kinds of things. I have always thought the “drunk cannot consent” rule was stupid as hell. Every other act you perform while drunk is held to the same standard of the law (if you kill someone while drunk you are still a murderer). The exception is if the state you are in is not directly caused by YOUR actions (getting roofied). Other than that kind of thing….you made the choice to drink so any actions after are yours too. If you consented while drunk…you consented, end of story. Regretting your choice does not make the other person a rapist be it man or woman. i was drunk, she wasnt. heard a rumor 6 months later she was knocked up, and then i spent 18 years paying child support.

Garfield Lasagna Bizkit Shirt

The moral here is any interaction between a man and a woman where legality is involved the Garfield Lasagna Bizkit Shirt besides I will buy this man is screwed because he is the bad guy by default. Women are inferior to men. So men are more accountable. Kind of like how you’re accountable to a pet. Is what they are saying. The fucking thing doesn’t even make sense. Why is the guy the instant rapist? Seems to me like they were drunk and both had sex with eachother… This’ll get downvotes but consent is consent even if you give it while inebriated. People shouldn’t drink to excess, and if they are drunk, their recollection of events ain’t worth shit and shouldn’t be allowed to be held up in court. This is true though. Men you need to be careful because you’re guilty until proven innocent. And even if you are innocent, well your life is already ruined and your reputation is destroyed. The kicker? Nothing will happen to her. Idunno about the poster but at my college we got forced to do effectively consent training and they legit taught that if you’re a guy at a party drunk and a drunk girl comes up grabs you, kisses you and says come with me and go with her to her bedroom and she initiates sex that if she regrets it tomorrow you sexually assaulted her as the man. So yes this bullshit still exists. Probably not, but that’s still very much the sentiment. Years ago I fell for a girl but she didn’t feel the same about me but webecame really good friends for years. After the initial rejection I only saw her as a friend and every hang out was extremely platonic. We would stay at eachothers houses all the time sometimes even sleeping in the same bed but there was no hint of romance ever. One night though, like three years of it being like that we got got very drunk and had sex. I assumed it was just that and nothing more and things would be normal the next day. Nope. Police at my door in the morning asking if I raped her. I told them we were drunk and had sex but that was it. I was arrested but not charged as she decided not to pursue it. But our friendship was over instantly. In her eyes, the cops eyes, and all of our mutual friends I was a predator. The funny thing? Shekissed me first and I pushed her away. She put her hand down my pants and I told her to stop. Doesn’t matter. Men are always the predator and women are always the victim.

Garfield Lasagna Bizkit Shirt, hoodie, tank top, long sleeve tee

This does seem like a double standard, she’s too drunk to consent, he has to be cognizant of that even while drunk. Also obviously if violence was used this doesn’t apply, but that’s not the Garfield Lasagna Bizkit Shirt besides I will buy this message here. Now if you look at woman the wrong way you can be charged wit sexual assault, domestic violence, arson, genocide… He could very well be charged for rape, whether or not it’s right, that’s the way the courts see it. It’s still a very valid PSA, even if for the wrong reasons. And this is why Gen Z is having less sex than previous gens, and why so many young men are checking out of the dating pool and getting their minds warped by right-wing grifters. It actually depends on the sex act. penetration enacted by Jake would constitute assault by him. fellatio or penetration enacted by Josie would constitute assault by her. A person can be drunk and not commit a crime. A person can be drunk and be the victim of a crime. The specific action does matter, although drunk parties may be unreliable narrators. The infamous Brock Turner for instance did drink, but he assaulted the drunk victim and was not a victim himself. There are legitimately women alive right now, who believe this is true. This is the sexual assault equivalent of, “girl punches guy in face. Everyone stops and watches. Guy punches back at girl. 12 dudes come running in and tackle guy.”

Jake is blind. Josie is blind. They walked into each other on a street and both stumbled. Josie could not see Jake. The next day, Jake was charged with assault. Because only women are mentally weak like that. Men are always bastions of mental and physical fortitude and if the Garfield Lasagna Bizkit Shirt besides I will buy this do something wrong it’s because they had bad evil intentions lol You literally hurt my soul I would literally shoot a shotgun full of Lego into my eyeballs then have to read your sheer stupidity again I’m straigh,t but from my view it looks like Jake has nicer bone structure, and the chick definitely looks more into him than he is into her. Jeez, I thought his comment was a little silly too but that’s a little extreme lmao. Bro does not like when his drinking is criticized OK, let’s look at this from a mid-2000s perspective and not a 2024 one. Obviously consent goes both ways right now. HOWEVER, back when, there was the myth of “we were both drunk, so it’s okay” as an excuse for SA. The message here is that you can’t use drunkenness for these crimes. Except the scenario they described wouldn’t have worked back then either. Nowhere in the scenario do they say that Jake forced himself on her or was in a state he himself was in more control than she was. They describe consensual drunken sex where both parties are equally intoxicated. The case would have gone nowhere.

How I can buy this Garfield Lasagna Bizkit Shirt

They need to add more detail for this scenario make any sense. For instance: was she passed out drunk and he not? Ah context helps. I was too young at that time. However, in the Garfield Lasagna Bizkit Shirt besides I will buy this early 10’s, when at uni, a random dude in one of my class raped someone pretty much passed out using the logic you described. No one was on his side, thankfully. I believe public health / safety posters on those topics are better nowadays. This one is quite extreme and altogether bad. Hold on a minute so if she wasn’t drunk and they hooked up wouldn’t she be the rapist. Also what if Josie was his cousin and they normally hookup but Jake was drunk this one time is he still a rapist? Dumb poster with an incredibly flawed logic, if two drunk people have sex it’s mutual end of discussion. If the girl can’t consent and she’s drunk then the same logic must apply for the drunk man. This woke BS needs to end. Double standard. If they’re both intoxicated, and that precludes the woman from giving consent, then the man was also unable to give consent. Why wouldn’t she be charged? I’ll tell you why. Because women have the luxury of being on the beneficial end of every double standard in our society including the ability to retroactively decide a sexual encounter they regret wasn’t consensual. I don’t really agree with this. Absolutely rape is wrong and should not be tolerated but how can you say she is drunk so she cannot make an informed decision but hold him accountable for his decision when he is drunk as well? Kind of a double standard. Well let’s be straight here, if Jake was drunk he couldn’t give any consent either… so he was also in essence raped according to that logic… but that’s not how it works is it, it’s only the woman who’s the victim. Both were victims by the way they’re describing it.
This is one of the Garfield Lasagna Bizkit Shirt besides I will buy this dumbest posters I’ve ever seen. Trying to make men out to always be the bad guy. If he was drunk then he also didn’t give consent Back in 2002, when I went to UCSB, all of the fraternities were closed due to multiple rape accusations of each one. It was so bad, the school declared a temporary ban on them to fix the problem. The only fraternity allowed to function was a Christian one, because it didn’t have any rape accusations. To say that it was scary as a woman in UCSB was an understatement. Rape was the number one crime by a landslide. Even though it was a crime, almost none of the men were convicted of rape. Women who reported it to the school were hushed, and often the police were not involved. These posters were to deter men not to rape, but most of them were keenly aware that jail didn’t happen to anyone who did rape a woman. After all, the school protected rapists to keep the name of the school clean. Trailing far behind was bike theft at number 2. For the year I went to UCSB I never went to a co-ed party. I only had parties with my 3 other female roommates. That was how bad it was. It wasn’t a fun college experience. And I hope it’s better for women today.
People are being very obtuse about the Garfield Lasagna Bizkit Shirt besides I will buy this context here. We did and do have a massive problem with men taking advantage of inebriated women in our culture. To the point where they have to pass these kinds of laws to make to make men think twice about sexual encounters with inebriated women. Have women taken advantage of inebriated men? Sure, it’s happened. Is it anywhere near as common? Nope. Brock Turner raped a passed out woman when he was drunk. If there weren’t witnesses he would say ‘we were both drunk’ and people would side with him. It only says that Josie could not give consent, so that should mean Jake could? They were both drunk, but he could be relaxed-and-laughing-a-lot drunk and she passed-out-on-the-floor-after-puking-on-herself drunk

1. Length is measured from the highest point on the collar down to the bottom hem. 2. Width is measured across the body of the shirt under the armpits, one way. 3. Sleeves are measured from center back to hem.