Easily distracted by books and my cat vintage retro shirt

Category

Trending Shirts

Design

Original artwork, copyright protected

Printing

Printed to order and shipped from the USA

Processing

2–3 business days after your order is placed.

Delivery

5–10 business days within the US, 7–15 business days internationally.

Cost

Calculated at checkout from your address and the number of items.

Tracking

A tracking number is emailed as soon as your order ships.

Read the full shipping policy

Edit: Anyone with the Easily distracted by books and my cat vintage retro shirt moreover I will buy this urge to downvote this should put their energy into deleting their goddamn Twitter account. Wasn’t this dude the darling of everything for most people less than 2 years ago? This meltdown is pretty crazy, anyone got a better fall from grace example on this scale? This qualifies as news? You people hate elon musk but can’t seem to stop talking about him. Cue the goobers calling me a fan boy. All the other bullshit sites will and their content will be pushed on the to the top of the news feed. After a few months of losing readers and interactions they’re going to change their tune. This is not about blue check marks that any user can get, but rather gold check marks for actual things that might want verification, which is a 1000 dollar fee. Coffee – used to be free everywhere it was served. We could walk into a dinner and have “just coffee” and owe nothing unless we ordered food to go with it. If that’s the case, why aren’t The New York Times keeping all that traffic to themselves and just posting it on their own site? Because the Platform that is Twitter is what people go for, and the ones who need it aren’t the average person, but the celebrities, the Brands that use it to reach them.

Easily distracted by books and my cat vintage retro shirt, hoodie, tank top, sweater and long sleeve t-shirt

And I’ve heard the Easily distracted by books and my cat vintage retro shirt moreover I will buy this argument “Twitter should pay these creators, they’re why people go to Twitter.” If that’s the case, why aren’t The New York Times keeping all that traffic to themselves and just posting it on their own site? They’ve in effect said the current arrangement is equitable. They post content there which drives traffic both to Twitter and to the NYT from people like me. What the NYT has said is they are not willing to pay Twitter to drive eyeballs to Twitter’s ads. They pay by providing content. They are not going to pay on top of that. I’ve been reading all these posts here and on other networks about the “book bans” based on similar foundation, so I put it in the same light. And they’re using it to make money. I guarantee the NYT makes a lot more of their income from being on Twitter than they do any of their other expenses, and those all cost more than $8 a month. Under Twitter rules, the NYT is an “organization” so their check mark would cost them $12,000 per year. Then on top of that there is paying for all their individual content creators on Twitter. Perhaps still a rounding error for an organization of their size, but I would assume that for them it is a matter of principle. But it now has 0 coming in from sale of user data, and they’re trying to recoup some through asking those who profit from using Twitter, to pay the cost of a cup of coffee / month to have an “I’m Special!” button next to their name.

1. Length is measured from the highest point on the collar down to the bottom hem. 2. Width is measured across the body of the shirt under the armpits, one way. 3. Sleeves are measured from center back to hem.